Major hotel chains launch marketing campaigns to woo customers away from travel-booking sites, which take commissions of up to 30% for each reservation (Chris Kirkham/Wall Street Journal)

Major hotel chains are engaging in an online turf war with the very travel sites that have helped drive their businesses.

Marriott International Inc., Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. and InterContinental Hotels Group are using extensive marketing campaigns to claw back business from Expedia Inc., Priceline Group Inc. and other travel-booking sites, which steer customers to hotel properties but also take commissions of up to 30% for…

via Techmeme

Original ‘Crazy Taxi’ Game Is Now Free For Mobile Devices

In the gaming world, there are various games that despite there being newer and more exciting will always remain a classic. Sega’s Crazy Taxi is one of them, and for those who wouldn’t mind revisiting the good old days, you’ll be pleased to learn that Sega has since made the game free to play on mobile.

In case you didn’t know, Crazy Taxi was actually released on mobile a while ago, but it was a paid title meaning you’d have to shell out money first before playing the game. However now that it is free to play, it means that you’ll be able to download it and start playing right off the bat without paying anything.

However as is the case with all free to play titles, there is a catch and that is in-game ads. Gamers will have to put up with various ads and promos that will pop up every now and then. However if you had previously paid for the game, you can remove the ads for free by going to the restore purchases option.

For those who are sick of ads and did not previously pay for the game, then you have the option of paying $2 to get rid of it. The app is available on both iOS and Android devices, so head on over to the iTunes App Store or Google Play for the download.

Original ‘Crazy Taxi’ Game Is Now Free For Mobile Devices , original content from Ubergizmo. Read our Copyrights and terms of use.

via Ubergizmo

Opinion: WeChat is eating the Chinese internet, and that’s not a good thing

If you want to understand how WeChat is changing the Chinese internet, I have a recommendation for you: Katamari Damacy.

In Katamari Damacy, a 2004 video game published by Japan’s Namco, players roll a very sticky ball called a katamari across the landscape, building it up by collecting increasingly large objects until virtually everything in the world has become part of the ball. If you’ve done your job right, at the end of a level, almost no independent objects remain.

Increasingly, China’s internet looks to me like a game of Katamari Damacy, and WeChat is the katamari. What began as a simple chat app has slowly added features that include everything from ecommerce to gaming to video sharing. Today, you can use WeChat to do almost everything in your life, from booking a cab to paying your water bill.

If you’re a Chinese internet user, over the past few years you’ve probably seen a dozen of your usual internet activities move onto the WeChat platform. More than half of WeChat users spend 90-plus minutes a day using the app. The latest online activity in danger of being absorbed into the WeChat machine is search, and my colleague Eva is right to suggest that Baidu should be worried. For the moment, there’s little overlap, but in the long run, WeChat’s search can leverage an absolute mountain of user data to provide personalized results Baidu likely can’t compete with.

In a world where most Chinese internet interactions happen through WeChat’s platform, Tencent gains a disconcerting level of control.

Certainly, Baidu wouldn’t be the first company to feel an impact from WeChat encroaching on its business. Alibaba’s Alipay, which once enjoyed relative dominance in China’s epayment market, is now only slightly ahead of Tencent’s WeChat Pay alternative. Video streaming services Youku-Tudou and iQiyi, which ruled China’s web when WeChat was first launched (despite the fact that Tencent did have a competing platform at that time), are now essentially equaled in market share by Tencent’s platform, thanks in no small part to WeChat. In digital advertising, Tencent started from further behind, but it’s already cutting into the lead enjoyed by market leaders Baidu and Alibaba, and it’s only expected to keep growing. The app’s influence is now so pervasive, in fact, that many Chinese internet startups choose to set up shop inside WeChat from day one rather than even attempting to build their own platforms.

All of this is excellent news for Tencent – which, not entirely coincidentally, just posted its best quarter ever and is now at a record high valuation of US$326 billion. But it may not be great news for people in general. China’s internet, which is already a virtual intranet thanks to the Great Firewall, seems to be in the process of shrinking even further, compressed onto a platform that is owned not by the people or the government, but by a for-profit corporation.

In a world where most Chinese internet interactions happen through WeChat’s platform, Tencent gains a disconcerting level of control over everything from business to entertainment to public discourse. If you’re a startup founder, for example, it might choose to block mentions of your business on its platform, or shut down other WeChat channels that connect to your products (sound far-fetched? Actually, that has already happened). Or it might simply use its vast, all-encompassing database of user data to copy your service and market a WeChat version of it that’s more convenient to all your customers. Even in a best-case scenario, if WeChat is China’s everything app, then businesses have to play by Tencent’s rules or forget about getting access to a vast majority of the internet-using population.

The more widely-used WeChat becomes, the more difficult extricating oneself from the platform becomes.

Needless to say, there are also serious security implications inherent in any market where people meet their every need through a single app. Already, if your WeChat account is hacked, the hackers could have access to everything from your bank accounts and your friends’ contacts to your health records and your shopping habits. The more everyday activities shift onto WeChat, the worse such a breach becomes.

And in this hypothetical WeChat world, if the entire system ever went down – imagine Tencent itself was hacked, or simply pushed a faulty update – Chinese internet commerce itself would come to a grinding halt.

We’re not there yet, obviously. Tencent still has powerful competitors in Baidu and Alibaba, and although Chinese internet users love WeChat, they’re still using other platforms, too. That said, it’s difficult to find a metric that isn’t trending in Tencent’s direction these days. Across a wide variety of internet verticals, Tencent is steadily creeping up on – or surpassing – competitors thanks in no small part to WeChat’s ubiquity. Once those competitors get far enough behind, they become functionally irrelevant, and Tencent gets the power to do more or less what it wants with that vertical.

While in theory users could choose to opt-out if WeChat reaches that level of control, the more widely-used WeChat becomes for aspects of everyday life (and the more of its competitors are eliminated) the more difficult extricating oneself from the platform becomes. It’s hassle enough to switch between chat apps. Imagine the hassle of switching away from an app that controlled your banking, shopping, food ordering, utility and bill payments, workplace communications, news and entertainment consumption, gaming and more, especially given that viable mobile competitors for some of those services might not be easy to find. While technically consumers always have the choice of not using WeChat, the bigger and more popular it gets, the less practical a choice that is.

Interestingly, the biggest barrier to WeChat eating China’s internet could be the government itself. China does have an antitrust law, and Tencent has already been sued for violating it once, although it was ultimately cleared. Legally speaking, challengers would need to prove that Tencent had somehow abused its position as the market leader with WeChat to have any hope of effecting change.

The legal implications of WeChat’s further growth may be best left for another day (and for someone who, unlike me, is knowledgeable about Chinese law). But it may be worth toning down some of the exuberance over WeChat’s impressive growth and its increasingly all-encompassing feature set. Yes, it offers incredible convenience, but you may find it less convenient when Tencent’s behemoth katamari rolls over your favorite corner of the internet.

This post Opinion: WeChat is eating the Chinese internet, and that’s not a good thing appeared first on Tech in Asia.

via Penn Olson

These Photos Take On Over-Sexualization By Showing The Mundane In The Nude

It’s rare to see art that depicts nude bodies — particularly female ones — without eroticizing them. This convention is incredibly frustrating for many women. After all, the majority of our lives are spent not posing as sexual objects, but just going about our work and everyday tasks. That’s why Sophia Vogel’s nude photographs are so refreshing. Instead of trying to force her subjects’ bodies into seductive positions or flattering lighting, she captures them in the midst of the mundane activities they’d do if there were no camera around, like sitting at tables or reading books.

The people Vogel photographs are not models but volunteers who come to her Berlin studio and chat before the shoots begin, Hello Giggles reports. Once they’re comfortable, she has them do something that’s part of their normal routine and photographs them fully clothed. Then, they recreate the same action nude, and she captures the exact same scene — minus the clothing. She posts the two versions side by side on her Instagram page to juxtapose them. What’s striking about the nude ones is that though you can tell the people are naked, it’s really the action that draws your eye’s attention.

By showing naked people acting the same way they would if they were clothed, Vogel is trying to demonstrate that nudity is no big deal. "Over the last couple of years, nudity has emerged from being one of society’s taboos," she told Vice. "I love to present nudity in an aesthetic manner without any sexual context."

Ich war heute im schönen Greifswald mit diesen wunderbaren Menschen & wir haben ganz fantastische Fotos für mein Fotoprojekt " with and without " gemacht! Ich danke euch gaaanz herzlich für euer Engagement!! Freut euch auf die Fotos 🙈 ich suche nach wie vor noch Menschen in Berlin in allen Altersklassen, die gerne mit machen möchten! Außerdem fahre ich nochmal nach Stuttgart & nach München. Gibts da noch Menschen, die gerne mit machen möchten? Ich freu mich auf Euch! Schreibt mir ne DM oder über das Kontaktformular auf: das Projekt läuft noch genau bis Ende Mai, wer also noch Teil des Projekts werden möchte: jetzt oder nie 🤘🏽 #sophiavogelphotos #photography #photoproject #photographer #natural #nature #bodylove #bodypositive #bodypositivity #beyourself #loveyourself #loveproject #artproject #withandwithout #jederistschön #beautifulnature #crewlove #beauty #camping #mitundohne #ostsee #meer #schönemenschen #makingoff #behindthescenes #sophiavogel

A post shared by sophiavogel (@sobirdy) on Apr 8, 2017 at 2:52pm PDT

Another goal of hers is to challenge beauty standards by showcasing every kind of body. "We are observed and judged every day, and the fashion industry lavishes beauty ideals and criticism on us. We set high standards for ourselves," she said. "By presenting all kinds of different body shapes and natural postures, I would love to show that everybody is beautiful in their own way." As one fan wrote to Vogel, beauty’s not the same thing as sex appeal — and as her work shows, it’s not just in what we look like but also in what we do.

Danke für das liebe Feedback zum Artikel in der BZ. Nach wie vor suche ich in Berlin noch allerhand Damen & Herren, die am Projekt teilnehmen möchten, in allen Altersklassen ab der Volljährigkeit. Denn so langsam geht es Richtung Endspurt, bald beginne ich das crowdfunding und daaaann soll das Ganze ja in ein Buch, also wer noch mit machen möchte, dann jetzt! Desweiteren möchte ich auch gerne noch für spannende Motive in andere Städte fahren. Wo soll ich denn hin kommen? Wer hat wo Lust? Meldet euch gern! Hamburg & Leipzig würde auf dem Zettel stehen, gäbe es da noch Menschen mit denen ich bisher noch nicht schrieb, die aber gerne teilnehmen möchten? Ebenso ffm & Umland uuund wie steht es um München? Außerdem Köln? Ruhrpott an sich? Göttingen? Stuttgart? In diesen Städten habe ich je eine Person, die gerne mit machen möchte, da ich die Fahrtkosten jedoch aus eigener Tasche zahle, wäre es toll, wenn sich es mehr lohnen würde dorthin zu fahren 🙂 falls jemand aber ganz unbedingt möchte, dass ich vorbei komme – darf er das Projekt auch gerne mit einer Fahrtkostenspende supporten 🙈 Danke an den Herrn auf dem Bild. alle Infos zum Projekt: #sophiavogelphotos #withandwithout #photoproject #artproject #bodylove #bodypositive #bodypositive #workworkwork #tfp #modelswanted

A post shared by sophiavogel (@sobirdy) on Feb 8, 2017 at 9:59am PST

Like what you see? How about some more R29 goodness, right here?

This Guy’s Attempt To Get His Girl Flowers Was A Total Fail — & The Internet Loves It

Inside The Lives Of Strippers — On & Off The Stage (NSFW)

How To Ask Someone To Come Back To Your Place — Without Feeling Weird About It

via Refinery29

Analysis of WannaCry ransom message raises links to China

WannaCry Ransomware

When the WannaCry ransomware took hold earlier this month, it quickly began infecting thousands of machines in a number of countries all across the world. In the process, it even managed to infect computers at the National Health Service in the UK, effectively disabling IT systems at a number of hospitals.

All told, it’s believed that WannaCry managed to infect upwards of 300,000 machines, a figure that could have been much higher had it not been for a security researcher who accidentally stumbled upon the malware’s kill-switch. Incidentally, security researchers, the days following the attack, even managed to come up with a solution for some impacted users, effectively allowing them to reclaim their encrypted files without forking over $300 worth of Bitcoin to an unknown group of hackers.

Continue reading…

Trending right now:

  1. New leaks show the iPhone 8 design we’re hoping for
  2. Leaked images show Samsung’s all-new, non-exploding Galaxy Note 7
  3. New ‘Judy’ malware on Android may have infected 36 million devices

via BGR

A psychologist debunks the claim that fidget spinners help kids focus

Fidget spinners are everywhere these days. You can buy them on any street corner for a few dollars, and both kids and adults are obsessed with them. The companies that make these hot new gadgets claim they help relieve stress and anxiety and can help kids with ADHD focus. David Anderson, PhD, a clinical psychologist from the Child Mind Institute, shares his thoughts on spinners.

Follow Tech Insider: On Facebook

Following is a transcript of the video:

They’re a toy. They’re a gag gift. Not so much a treatment.

My name is Dr. Dave Anderson. I’m  a clinical psychologist who trained and specializing in treatment for ADHD and behavior disorders.

Fidget spinners are a new craze similar to the slime craze earlier this year, where you have a couple arms, a little device that spins while you hold it. It has kind of this gyroscopic feel where you’re balancing it, maybe you could do some tricks with it.

This is a fidget spinner.

They’re easy to buy, they’re on every street corner, and there’s a sense that, you know, to be cool you need to have one.

So the great thing about fidget spinners is that they’ve brought the discussion for what works for ADHD or what might work for anxiety or stress relief to the forefront, which is great for us to have. The only issue is they have about as much scientific evidence for stress relief or for treatment of anxiety and ADHD as a pet rock.

They’re a toy. They’re not a treatment.

So the thing is there’s no psychologically recommended gadget. There are only gadgets that fall in line with scientifically-based psychological principles.

So the idea is for a kid experiencing stress, or anxiety, or depression, or ADHD, we might create, say, a coping kit for that child, when they’re experiencing certain amounts of stress. That might include music to listen to. It might include a stress ball tho squeeze. It might include something to remind them to breathe or to practice a mindfulness strategy.

But it’s really on a case-by-case basis. There’s no universal recommendations of a particular toy for stress relief or a particular object for stress relief. Fidget spinners have absolutely no scientific studies behind them, showing any sort of effectiveness in treating this. And the major reason for that is that they’re a fad.

They’ve only just come about, and scientific studies take time and money. So if something is really new, and it’s making a lot of noise, it’s unlikely to be scientifically supported. And if we’re talking about treatment for anxiety, or ADHD, or for stress relief, we wanna go after things that have a bit more scientific support, like cognitive behavioral strategies for managing their symptoms.

In other words, a way of noticing when they might be distractable, or when they might be having difficulty focusing and figure out how they might be able to get back on task.

We teach them about how to break test into smaller pieces and how to make sure that they are going through each of those pieces and planning for the time that it might take.

I think it’s always an issue when any company makes a sensational claim about a new product that provides treatment that isn’t backed by science for mental illness. Fidget spinners are low in terms of that hierarchy, partly because we don’t necessarily think they’re doing any harm. Adults don’t seem swayed in thinking that this is a treatment, and it mainly seems like the kids have picked up on this argument that it’s helpful in stress relief, as an argument they might have with their teachers or with their parents, and nobody’s buying.

See Also:

via Business Insider

Experts poke holes in claims that fidget spinners can treat ADHD

Experts poke holes in claims that fidget spinners can treat ADHD

Teachers' worst nightmare.
Teachers’ worst nightmare.

Image: Drew Angerer/Getty Images

Fidget spinners are a fun, relaxing fount of mindless entertainment. But are they really more than a cheap toy?

Some experts say no. Despite marketing claims, there’s no research that shows the wildly popular spinners are therapeutic tools for people with anxiety, autism, or attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). 

“I know there’s lots of similar toys … and there’s basically no scientific evidence that those things work across the board,” Scott Kollins, a clinical psychologist and professor at Duke University, told NPR on Sunday.

That doesn’t mean the three-pronged plastic phenomena don’t provide any real benefits, or that parents and educators are wrong when they say it helps some children focus in the classroom. But retailers may be stretching the truth when they label these devices as treatments for fidgety behavior, minuscule attention spans, or discomfort in a classroom setting.

You sure about that, Mr. Fidget Spinner Maker?

You sure about that, Mr. Fidget Spinner Maker?

“It’s important for parents and teachers who work with kids who have ADHD to know that there are very well studied and documented treatments that work, and that they’re out there, so there’s not really quick and easy fixes like buying a toy,” Kollins told NPR. 

About 11 percent of U.S. children between the ages of 4 and 17 — or 6.4 million kids — have been diagnosed with ADHD as of 2011, according to the Centers of Disease Control and Prevention.

Their parents often search for help beyond the typical medication, which might make them more vulnerable to marketing efforts that falsely lump these toys in the category of evaluated, proven solutions that help students focus and learn.

Another expert had a similarly skeptical view of fidget spinners.

“Using a spinner-like gadget is more likely to serve as a distraction than a benefit for individuals with ADHD,” Mark Rapport, a clinical psychologist at the University of Central Florida who has studied the benefits of movement on attention in people with ADHD, told LiveScience earlier this month. 

Still, parents and some developmental specialists have defended fidget spinners, even as teachers and schools banned them from the classroom for being too disruptive. Proponents argue that, under the right circumstances, spinners and devices like them can soothe an anxious student or calm a hyperactive mind.

Hmm, maybe not.

Hmm, maybe not.

“These little gadgets should be called fidget tools, not toys, and they can be part of a successful strategy for managing fidgety behavior if they are introduced as a normal part of the classroom culture,” Claire Heffron, a pediatric occupational therapist in Cleveland, recently told the Washington Post.

A 2015 study found that students with ADHD performed better on a computerized attention test the more intensely they fidgeted. Children without ADHD, meanwhile, did not improve their test score with fidgeting.

But Julie Schweitzer, the study’s author and a clinical psychologist at the University of California at Davis, said it’s too early to know whether fidget spinners could deliver similar results. 

“We need to study them to find if they make a difference and for whom,” Schweitzer told the Post.

via Mashable!